We have noted on the Swanson 30 Cutter Rig recently for sale, that the owner replaced the rig with a Swanson 32 rig. He also made his own sails.
My guess is he improved his acceleration to his maximum speed on all points of sail, and it achieved a faster speed in light winds than could have been achieved with the original rig and sails.
Do you agree?
Does anyone have an idea what those speeds would be?
Square root of the waterline length in feet multiplied by 1.3.
I thought x 1.4?
edit: just googled it... 1.34
Actually is was a Swanson 28, which is a particularly stubby design. Extra sail area is only going to help you in light winds.
The sail area a yacht can fly in high winds is limited by the righting moment. So unless the boat had increased keel weight, in fact the strong wind performance would be reduced by the heavier boom and other bits and pieces added at high level.
Actually is was a Swanson 28, which is a particularly stubby design. Extra sail area is only going to help you in light winds.
The sail area a yacht can fly in high winds is limited by the righting moment. So unless the boat had increased keel weight, in fact the strong wind performance would be reduced by the heavier boom and other bits and pieces added at high level.
^^ This!
square root of the waterline length in feet multiplied by the block co efficient. 1.3, 1.4 sounds about right for a swanno
square root of the waterline length in feet multiplied by the block co efficient. 1.3, 1.4 sounds about right for a swanno
Just for the record, this rule of thumb applies to displacement hulls, those that push through the water. Many modern lightweight hulls with deep keels and wide hulls break this rule when they get up on the plane. And then there are foils!!
And then you have boats like the S&S34 which goes faster when at speed and/or heeled.
Upright the waterline length is approx 25 ft. This gives a theoretical max speed of 6.5kts.
However, when sailing at speed the stern digs in increasing the water line length to nearer 29ft and speed to 7.2kts.
When heeled the tumblehome increase water line length as well giving a bit more. I think about 7.5kts is the maximum without surfing.
With a decent wind and a good swell/sea behind me I've seen nearly 9 kts on MB. Azzurro has recorded 17 or so kts.
Some good simple info in this link.
www.ss34.org/index.php/the-ss34/technical/#speed
And then you have boats like the S&S34 which goes faster when at speed and/or heeled.
Upright the waterline length is approx 25 ft. This gives a theoretical max speed of 6.5kts.
However, when sailing at speed the stern digs in increasing the water line length to nearer 29ft and speed to 7.2kts.
When heeled the tumblehome increase water line length as well giving a bit more. I think about 7.5kts is the maximum without surfing.
With a decent wind and a good swell/sea behind me I've seen nearly 9 kts on MB. Azzurro has recorded 17 or so kts.
Some good simple info in this link.
www.ss34.org/index.php/the-ss34/technical/#speed
Great site.
Pity I can't find a similar one for the 39.
Also, to add the bull in the china shop, water line length hull speed is not a physical constant like the speed of light, its the point where the force required to move the boat faster has become exponentially more difficult and is a defined point of that. I could imagine beefing up sail size, and running downwind, could edge a boat a bit faster by brute force. But I'd love to hear from a naval architect about that. My Spacesailor 24 did a good 10+ knots towed behind a mates V8 ski boat years ago when we were in a hurry. Way past its hull speed
Found this: dmsonline.us/the-truth-of-hull-speed-how-to-break-the-sailing-speed-limit/
Another useful rule of thumb is: saving 1 kg in the rig is equivalent to adding 5 kg to the keel. Ie the use of modern low stretch halyards in the rig and perhaps even aramid standing rigging can increase righting moment and reduce pitching in a seaway
And then you have boats like the S&S34 which goes faster when at speed and/or heeled.
Upright the waterline length is approx 25 ft. This gives a theoretical max speed of 6.5kts.
However, when sailing at speed the stern digs in increasing the water line length to nearer 29ft and speed to 7.2kts.
When heeled the tumblehome increase water line length as well giving a bit more. I think about 7.5kts is the maximum without surfing.
With a decent wind and a good swell/sea behind me I've seen nearly 9 kts on MB. Azzurro has recorded 17 or so kts.
Some good simple info in this link.
www.ss34.org/index.php/the-ss34/technical/#speed
How can tumblehome increase waterline length? It's not measured along the edge of the immersed area, but from the fore-and-aft length along the water.
And then you have boats like the S&S34 which goes faster when at speed and/or heeled.
Upright the waterline length is approx 25 ft. This gives a theoretical max speed of 6.5kts.
However, when sailing at speed the stern digs in increasing the water line length to nearer 29ft and speed to 7.2kts.
When heeled the tumblehome increase water line length as well giving a bit more. I think about 7.5kts is the maximum without surfing.
With a decent wind and a good swell/sea behind me I've seen nearly 9 kts on MB. Azzurro has recorded 17 or so kts.
Some good simple info in this link.
www.ss34.org/index.php/the-ss34/technical/#speed
How can tumblehome increase waterline length? It's not measured along the edge of the immersed area, but from the fore-and-aft length along the water.
I'm not sure how it works to be honest. As the boat heels the length for and aft increases due to the way the boat sits in the water. It may be that it sits deeper due to the hull shape.
Maybe we have a naval architect who can explain.
I will keep away from water line length and have a go at your question about mast and sails.
Swanson 30 Cutter Rig recently for sale, that the owner replaced the rig with a Swanson 32 rig.
A taller rig means more sail area (than was originally specified for the boat).
This will mean in light conditions you can hoist more and go faster.
As the wind picks up you will need to reduce sail and probably bring the boat back to speed you would get out of the original rig.
The cutter rig could be a large genoa forward and a normal size inner foresail.
This would give you the combinations.
1. just full genoa.
2 just inner sail
but usually not both set at the same time.
If the foreward sail is a jib you will have a combination of;
1. just foreward sail.
2. just innersail
3 both sails.
If they are a genoa forward and an inner jib on roller furling , you then have those combinations.
In general a cutter will not give you extra speed, but a wider variety of foresail combinations.
I think the cutter rig was fitted for ease of handling more than a quest for speed.
My guess is he improved his acceleration to his maximum speed on all points of sail, and it achieved a faster speed in light winds than could have been achieved with the original rig and sails.
The question of acceleration is really tricky.
I think that really depends on sea conditions.
If you tack into steep chop with almost any rig and you will slow down before you take off.
Calmer conditions will allow the boat to pull away better.
gary
Cutters are rarely faster all-round. The best indication is that in most rating rules, the cutter's staysail is unrated and is therefore free area. There is nothing stopping anyone from rigging their TP52 or Farr 40 as a cutter - but they don't because they are not faster all-round. Cutters can be faster on reaches, but they require delicate trimming because the sails interact so much and it's easy for one sail to stuff up the others.
There were many cutter rigs in the early days of sailing and in almost all such classes there was a move to single headsails, which are generally faster.
That's not to say they are not a good cruising rig; the one I've sailed most works very well. But all-round they are not faster.
And then you have boats like the S&S34 which goes faster when at speed and/or heeled.
Upright the waterline length is approx 25 ft. This gives a theoretical max speed of 6.5kts.
However, when sailing at speed the stern digs in increasing the water line length to nearer 29ft and speed to 7.2kts.
When heeled the tumblehome increase water line length as well giving a bit more. I think about 7.5kts is the maximum without surfing.
With a decent wind and a good swell/sea behind me I've seen nearly 9 kts on MB. Azzurro has recorded 17 or so kts.
Some good simple info in this link.
www.ss34.org/index.php/the-ss34/technical/#speed
How can tumblehome increase waterline length? It's not measured along the edge of the immersed area, but from the fore-and-aft length along the water.
I'm not sure how it works to be honest. As the boat heels the length for and aft increases due to the way the boat sits in the water. It may be that it sits deeper due to the hull shape.
Maybe we have a naval architect who can explain.
I thought it was the stern overhang that lengthens the waterline with heal (lay the boat over and there is less hull overhang ,,, more in the water)
And then you have boats like the S&S34 which goes faster when at speed and/or heeled.
Upright the waterline length is approx 25 ft. This gives a theoretical max speed of 6.5kts.
However, when sailing at speed the stern digs in increasing the water line length to nearer 29ft and speed to 7.2kts.
When heeled the tumblehome increase water line length as well giving a bit more. I think about 7.5kts is the maximum without surfing.
With a decent wind and a good swell/sea behind me I've seen nearly 9 kts on MB. Azzurro has recorded 17 or so kts.
Some good simple info in this link.
www.ss34.org/index.php/the-ss34/technical/#speed
How can tumblehome increase waterline length? It's not measured along the edge of the immersed area, but from the fore-and-aft length along the water.
I'm not sure how it works to be honest. As the boat heels the length for and aft increases due to the way the boat sits in the water. It may be that it sits deeper due to the hull shape.
Maybe we have a naval architect who can explain.
I thought it was the stern overhang that lengthens the waterline with heal (lay the boat over and there is less hull overhang ,,, more in the water)
They have a lot of overhang at each end. My recollection was that the hull shape when heeled put more of the overhang in the water. How that is achieved I may have known once, but not anymore.
I haven't looked it up for many years but I believe 25 to 30 deg heel is the optimum. I can tell you it does more than 6.5 kts on the wind inside Pittwater with a fresh noreaster.
Cutter rig on a Swanson 28 will definately slow it down. Cutter rig on large yachts will give some gains on some points of sail. On a Swanson 28 the extra drag will kill the speed.
The Swanson 38 and 42 are designed as cutter rig .Neither are slow both are traditional full keel heavy displacement cruising yachts
I agree with your comment and it goes back to what I said " why do people want to change a proven design?
Regards Jb
The 28s haven't raced much but the one we raced when I was a kid was pretty slow. The 42s that have raced were not fast. For example, many years ago when they were new, two 42s raced in the windy 1976 Sydney to Hobart. They were over 25% slower than the first boat of their length, a day slower than the top Cole 43s which are older boats, and 16 hours behind the shorter, older, long-keeled Mercedes III. They were five hours behind an East Coast 31, two to three hours behind a Nicholson 36 (a 1960 design long keel cruiser/racer), half a day behind the first S&S 34, and hours behind several other cruising boats of similar length. A ferro high-freeboard long-keel Endurance 35 was only 2-3 hours behind. Their other races were similar, apart from one good performance when Mick Morris and a top crew of veterans pushed Sunbird home in a windy Mooloolaba race; the 42s typically finished hours behind boats like Currawong 30s, S&S 34s, Swanson 36s, etc; I did a long race on on once, and while "slow" is relative it's true to say they were much slower than the typical displacement cruiser/racer of their day, and of earlier years.
I want to thank all of you for giving me so much information on the Swanson 28.
I decided to buy it and these are some of the reasons.
Firstly, and most importantly to me, there were many things I liked about it.
On the test sail, I loved how it moved through the water. I was happy with its speed in 10 to12 knots even though it had not been antifouled in three years.
While it was a Swanson 28, it had a 32 rig.
It is in very good condition for its age, everything worked.
The owner was a electrical engineer who become a TAFE teacher. Everything on the boat had had a lot of thought put into it, over the twenty years he owned it.
He also spent two and a half hours in the handover explaining how everything worked and how he had made it work better.
I generally will be cruising alone and so I think I can live with the internal size.
The asking price was $18000. It was negotiable andI feel I got a lot of boat for my money.
Once again thank you all for your input.
I decided to buy it and these are some of the reasons.
... everything worked.
.... Everything on the boat had had a lot of thought put into it, over the twenty years he owned it.
Congrats Bundeena. The two things quoted above means quite a lot in my view.
To your original question BB.
Can increased rig size and sail plan increase boat speed on a Swanson 30
Did you ask the previous owner?
What did he have to say on the matter?
Congratulations on the new boat.
gary
Seriously he had spare parts for most things.
I will see him again this week and have more time to discuss the topic.
Enjoy her BB and welcome to the Swanson Family ?? She won't win round the cans or sail past cruiser racers .She is a solid and a sea kindly yacht like all Swanson's
Cheers Jb
I sailed on a Swanson 28 on a Wednesday race, the boat was owned by Laurie Mitchell sailmaker crewed by ken and Jim Swanson . The sailmaker complained about the design the two crews complained about the sails.A very funny day but also a day in which u could not help but learn.
The Swanson 42 in the 76 Hobart was cutter rigged with 12 crew and had not raced before.
The same boat raced in 79 and finished a lot higher up the fleet.